Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III on Friday overruled the overseer of the war court at Guantánamo Bay and revoked a plea agreement reached earlier this week with the accused mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and two alleged accomplices.
The Pentagon announced the decision with the release of a memorandum relieving the senior official at the Defense Department responsible for military commissions of her oversight of the capital case against Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and his alleged accomplices for the attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people in New York City, at the Pentagon and in a Pennsylvania field.
The overseer, retired Brig. Gen. Susan K. Escallier, signed a pretrial agreement on Wednesday with Mr. Mohammed, Walid bin Attash and Mustafa al-Hawsawi that exchanged guilty pleas for sentences of at most life in prison. In taking away the authority, Mr. Austin assumed direct oversight of the case and canceled the agreement, effectively reinstating it as a death-penalty case. He left Ms. Escallier in the role of oversight of Guantánamo’s other cases.
Because of the stakes involved, the “responsibility for such a decision should rest with me,” Mr. Austin said in an order released Friday night by the Pentagon.
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
Do you believe that the severity of a crime should influence the availability of plea deals for the accused?
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
How does the decision to revoke a plea deal impact your view of justice for victims and their families?
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
What personal or moral boundaries come into play when deciding if a life sentence or the death penalty is more appropriate for a crime?
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
Does the revocation of a plea deal in a terrorism case affect your feelings about how terrorism should be legally addressed and punished?
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
Should one individual have the power to override plea deals in high-profile cases, or should it be a group decision?
