Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsscience9mos ago

Should the government regulate the use of CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications?

CRISPR is a powerful tool for editing genomes, allowing for precise modifications to DNA that allows scientists to better understand gene functions, model diseases more accurately, and develop innovative treatments. Proponents argue that regulation ensures safe and ethical use of the technology. Opponents argue that too much regulation could stifle innovation and scientific progress.

13 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9mos9MO

Yes

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9mos9MO

No

 @9RTFVXYfrom Colorado  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, and ban all non-necessary genetic modification that is not related to health.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Do you think altering human genes to eliminate disease crosses an ethical line, or is it just the next step in human evolution?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How do you feel about the idea of using technology to control future generations' traits or abilities?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Should parents be allowed to use this kind of technology to select specific traits for their unborn children?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Do you believe using science to extend human lifespan is more of an opportunity or a danger?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How would you feel if someone edited their DNA to increase intelligence—fair game, or unfair advantage?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Could making genetic modifications increase social inequalities, or would it reduce them?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Would you personally use gene editing to eliminate a potential health issue in yourself or your family?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

What responsibility do you think we have to regulate how much technology like this is used in our society?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Can you name a potential positive or negative impact on nature and ecosystems if gene editing were widely applied outside humans?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

If you could change one genetic trait, what would it be and why?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3 days3D

Trump Targets FAA Diversity Programs In Crash Aftermath

Trump made controversial claims linking diversity initiatives at the FAA to a deadly Potomac River collision that killed 67 people, despite acknowledging he had no evidence to support these assertions.The disability recruitment program Trump criticized actually began during his own administration in April 2019, with the FAA launching a pilot program for 20 people with targeted disabilities to work in air traffic operations.Experts, including Tennessee Garvey from the Organization of Black Aerospace Professionals, stated that no aviation incident has ever been attributed to diversity initiatives as a cause or contributing factor.The federal policy for hiring people with disabilities dates back to the Bush administration in 2003 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which was initially created to protect veterans with disabilities.FAA workforce diversity has shown minimal changes over recent years: white male representation decreased from 58.9% in 2016 to 55.3% in 2023, while employees with targeted disabilities increased from 0.7% to 2%.The aviation industry's diversity efforts were primarily driven by labor shortages and the need to fill positions as pilots retire, rather than purely demographic goals.All candidates, regardless of background or disability status, must meet the same rigorous standards for aptitude, medical qualifications, and security clearances.Historical barriers, including segregation, prevented Black aviation professionals from entering the industry until the civil rights movement and subsequent lawsuits.The Biden administration has continued similar diversity initiatives, with slight increases in representation across different demographic groups.A pending lawsuit filed by a conservative legal organization claims discrimination against applicants due to Obama-era hiring practices, though the case hasn't been resolved.

▲  179 replies