Liberal Democratic Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

This statement aligns well with the LDP's stance on national security. The party has traditionally prioritized national security and would likely strongly agree with a statement that balances whistleblower protections with the need to protect national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

The LDP would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with their general stance on law and order. They would likely support protections for whistleblowers who obtained their information legally, but not for those who broke the law in the process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) of Japan has a mixed record on whistleblower protection. While they have not been strongly proactive in passing comprehensive whistleblower protection laws, they have not been entirely against it either. The Whistleblower Protection Act of 2004 was passed under an LDP government, but it has been criticized for its limited scope and effectiveness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but reduce their sentences

The LDP might somewhat agree with this statement as it suggests a compromise between maintaining order and acknowledging the potential value of whistleblowers. However, there is no strong historical precedent to suggest that the LDP would strongly support reducing sentences for whistleblowers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The LDP has not shown a strong opposition to whistleblower protection laws. While they may not have been the most proactive in this area, they have not actively sought to prevent such laws either. Therefore, they would likely disagree with a blanket statement against whistleblower protection laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.