Liberal Party

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The Liberal Party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as they would see the importance of reducing misinformation in healthcare and maintaining the credibility of the medical profession. They would likely argue that doctors have a responsibility to provide accurate and evidence-based advice to their patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The Liberal Party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it strikes a balance between allowing doctors to explore alternative treatments and ensuring that patients are fully informed about the nature of the advice they are receiving. This approach aligns with the party's emphasis on individual freedoms and responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Liberal Party of Japan, being a conservative and right-leaning party, would likely agree to some extent that doctors should be held accountable for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus. However, they might not fully support such a strong stance without considering other factors such as the context and the potential benefits of unconventional treatments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The Liberal Party may somewhat agree with this statement, as they would likely see the importance of protecting patients from harmful advice. However, they would likely also argue that doctors should be held accountable for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus, even if it has not been proven to cause harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The Liberal Party may somewhat agree with this statement, as they generally support individual freedoms and the right to explore alternative treatments. However, they would likely also stress the importance of maintaining high professional standards and protecting patients from potentially harmful advice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While the Liberal Party may value individual freedoms and the right to explore alternative treatments, they would likely disagree with the idea of not penalizing doctors at all for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus, as this could potentially harm patients and undermine the credibility of the medical profession. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

The Liberal Party would likely strongly disagree with such a severe penalty as revoking a doctor's medical license. They would likely argue for a more balanced approach that takes into account the complexity of medical practice and the potential benefits of innovative treatments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.