5 U.S. states have passed laws requiring welfare recipients to be tested for drugs. Proponents argue that testing will prevent public funds from being used to subsidize drugs habits and help get treatment for those that are addicted to drugs. Opponents argue that it is a waste of money since the tests will cost more money than they save.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
City
Response rates from 2.5k Liberal Democratic Party voters.
66% Yes |
34% No |
56% Yes |
27% No |
4% Yes, and immediately terminate benefits for anyone testing positive |
5% No, only if they have a criminal history related to drug abuse |
4% Yes, but provide treatment for those testing positive |
2% No, this is a waste of time and money |
2% Yes, test anyone receiving money from the government including employees and politicians |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.5k Liberal Democratic Party voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 2.5k Liberal Democratic Party voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Liberal Democratic Party voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9JNPM5610mos10MO
Yes, test EVERYBODY receiving money from the government including employees and politicians, with benefits and funding terminated for anybody testing positive
@8KJM8BG4yrs4Y
Yes, but instead of providing monetary support which could end back up in drug purchases, provide a limited amount of support for those testing positive.
