5 U.S. states have passed laws requiring welfare recipients to be tested for drugs. Proponents argue that testing will prevent public funds from being used to subsidize drugs habits and help get treatment for those that are addicted to drugs. Opponents argue that it is a waste of money since the tests will cost more money than they save.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
City
Response rates from 314 Liberalism voters.
30% Yes |
70% No |
21% Yes |
59% No |
6% Yes, but provide treatment for those testing positive |
9% No, only if they have a criminal history related to drug abuse |
2% Yes, test anyone receiving money from the government including employees and politicians |
3% No, this is a waste of time and money |
1% Yes, and immediately terminate benefits for anyone testing positive |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 314 Liberalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 314 Liberalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Liberalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9JNPM5610mos10MO
Yes, test EVERYBODY receiving money from the government including employees and politicians, with benefits and funding terminated for anybody testing positive
@8KJM8BG4yrs4Y
Yes, but instead of providing monetary support which could end back up in drug purchases, provide a limited amount of support for those testing positive.
