21%
Yes
79%
No
17%
Yes
72%
No
2%
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
7%
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
1%
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
1%
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
0%
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Mandatory Military Service” has changed over time for 38.1k Japan voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Mandatory Military Service” has changed over time for 38.1k Japan voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Japan users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9JTY5RLanswered…2mos2MO

CERTAINLY! It should be for 5 years of service, it should be seen as an honour to serve in the military as well!

 @94H4S9Vfrom Hyogo answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but they should decrease the training time and provide a better environment and offerings. The current salary for Korean soldiers is too less. As the US did, the government should provide a bunch of benefits since all the young Korean man are spending their time in the country.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Mandatory Military Service” news articles, updated frequently.

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to Japan voters.