See which political parties and ideologies match your personal beliefs
Take the quiz!
The worlds #1 voting guide for 79,350,216 politically engaged citizens
Here is the current rank of the most important political issues for Japanese voters.
Here are the stories making headlines in political news today.
@ThrilledB4llotBox2hrs2H
If the bill's supporters get what they want, millions of Americans would find their ability to access TikTok terminated by the government, just in time for the November 2024 election. This radical state intervention was endorsed last week by the House Energy and Commerce Committee in a unanimous 50-0 vote, establishing a coveted bipartisan consensus in favor of expelling American users from their preferred social media platform. This extreme action is to be carried out, as usual, in the alleged name of "national security," and to more aggressively combat perceived "foreign adversaries."The bill names TikTok as a "foreign adversary controlled application," with the "adversary" in question being China, but it also goes further and prohibits "applications" associated with the standard litany of official U.S. "adversaries"—Russia, North Korea, and Iran. More additions to the list are always possible, perhaps in the event that Cuba or Venezuela develop a short-form dance video app that becomes suspiciously popular with American teens.Another provision authorizes the President, who is currently Joe Biden and may soon be Donald Trump, to make unilateral determinations about whether certain applications "present a significant threat to the national security of the United States," and therefore must be banned like TikTok. The criteria for making such a determination is left conspicuously vague.So if you really want to give Biden or Trump more unilateral power to control the proliferation of content online, this appears to be just the bill for you.
@HumbleDiplomacy3hrs3H
The US regime supports a Palestinian state. Just not now. And not until it allows the US - the primary sponsor of the Israeli occupation - to midwife a “state” with no military, in which Israel controls its borders, airspace, maritime territory, and political leadership. In other words, not until Palestine…
@ISIDEWITH4hrs4H
In a series of stark warnings that have reverberated through the corridors of power in Washington, CIA Director William Burns has highlighted a grim forecast for Ukraine amidst its ongoing conflict with Russia. Burns has unequivocally stated that without a significant ramp-up in military support from the United States, Ukraine stands on the precipice of defeat by the end of 2024. This dire prediction underscores the critical role of US aid in the balance of power in Eastern Europe and the broader implications for international security and democratic sovereignty.The urgency of Burns' message comes at a pivotal moment as the US House of Representatives gears up to vote on a substantial $61 billion aid package for Ukraine. This financial lifeline, aimed at bolstering Ukraine's military capabilities, has faced delays, primarily due to opposition from Republican lawmakers closely aligned with former President Donald Trump. The CIA director's warnings serve not only as a call to action but as a sobering reminder of the high stakes involved in the US's foreign policy decisions.Burns' analysis paints a picture of a Ukrainian military stretched thin, running low on ammunition and essential resources necessary to sustain its defense efforts against Russian aggression. The potential for Russia, under Vladimir Putin, to dictate the terms of a political settlement in the absence of increased Western support is a scenario that carries significant geopolitical ramifications. It highlights the intricate dance of diplomacy, military strategy, and international alliances that define the current global order.The implications of Burns' warnings extend beyond the immediate military and political concerns, touching on the broader themes of democracy, sovereignty, and the international community's commitment to upholding these principles. The situation in Ukraine is a litmus test for the resolve of democratic nations in the face of authoritarian aggression, making the decisions of the US lawmakers all the more consequential.As the world watches closely, the outcome of the impending aid package vote and the subsequent actions of the United States will not only determine the fate of Ukraine but also signal the depth of America's commitment to global stability and democratic values. The clock is ticking, and the decisions made today will resonate far beyond the battlefields of Eastern Europe, shaping the international landscape for years to come.
@ISIDEWITH4hrs4H
Representatives from more than 30 countries gathered in Brussels in March at a nuclear summit hosted by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the Belgian government. Thirty-four nations, including the United States and China, agreed “to work to fully unlock the potential of nuclear energy,” including extending the lifetime of existing reactors, building new nuclear power plants and deploying advanced reactors.“Nuclear technology can play an important role in the clean energy transition,” Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, told summit attendees. But she added that “the reality today, in most markets, is a reality of a slow but steady decline in market share” for nuclear powerThe numbers underscore that downturn. Solar and wind power together began outperforming nuclear power globally in 2021, and that trend continues as nuclear staggers along. Solar alone added more than 400 gigawatts of capacity worldwide last year, two-thirds more than the previous year. That’s more than the roughly 375 gigawatts of combined capacity of the world’s 415 nuclear reactors, which remained relatively unchanged last year. Pledging to triple nuclear capacity by 2050 is a little like promising to win the lottery.For the United States, it would mean adding an additional 200 gigawatts of nuclear operating capacity (almost double what the country has ever built) to the 100 gigawatts or so that now exists, generated by more than 90 commercial reactors that have been running an average of 42 years. Globally it would mean tripling the existing capacity built over the past 70 years in less than half that time in addition to replacing reactors that will shut down before 2050.The Energy Department estimates the total cost of such an effort in the United States at roughly $700 billion. For much less money and in less time, the world can reduce greenhouse gas emissions through the use of renewables like solar, wind, hydropower and geothermal power.
@ISIDEWITH5hrs5H
In a world where political integrity is under constant examination, recent allegations have emerged that put the spotlight on political figures in both the United States and the United Kingdom. In the US, Representative Matt Gaetz is facing an investigation by the House Ethics Committee over claims that he attended a party in 2017 where a minor and drugs were present. This inquiry is part of a broader investigation into whether Gaetz used illicit drugs while serving as a member of Congress, with particular interest in his behavior at parties in Florida following his election in 2017.Across the Atlantic, the political scene in the UK is also facing its share of controversy. Angela Rayner, a prominent figure in the Labour Party, is embroiled in a dispute over her previous living arrangements. The situation has escalated as her former aide, Matt Finnegan, reportedly provided a police statement that contradicts Rayner's claims, deepening the row and drawing attention from both the public and political opponents.These incidents highlight the ongoing challenges political figures face in maintaining their personal integrity while in the public eye. The allegations against both Gaetz and Rayner, though differing in nature, underscore the scrutiny politicians endure regarding their personal lives and conduct. As investigations continue, the outcomes could have significant implications for their careers and the political landscape in their respective countries.The public's trust in political institutions is crucial for the functioning of democracies, and allegations of misconduct can erode this trust. As such, the importance of transparency and accountability in addressing these claims cannot be overstated. The coming weeks and months will likely see further developments in these cases, as both the US and UK grapple with the implications of these allegations for their political systems.While the situations involving Gaetz and Rayner are distinct, they collectively serve as a reminder of the global nature of political scrutiny and the universal demand for ethical conduct among elected officials. As these stories unfold, they will undoubtedly continue to capture the attention of the public and media alike, underscoring the ongoing dialogue about the standards to which political figures are held.
Here are the most active political discussions happening right now.
iSideWith offers voters a comprehensive platform to analyze and refine their political beliefs, enabling them to make more educated choices at the polls while staying updated on key issues.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent political news headlines, updated frequently.
Toggle your country setting to compare your political beliefs with other citizens, parties, and candidates around the world. Find out which issues other countries care about the most.
Here is the current rank of the most popular political ideologies for Japanese voters.
iSideWith.com is a fully independent platform, free from any affiliation with investors, shareholders, political parties, or interest groups, ensuring unbiased assistance for voters in understanding and navigating political issues.
Here is a list of influential tweets promoting informed voting.
Educate yourself and make your OWN decision! http://t.co/yMmsYn5n
— Kim Kardashian (@KimKardashian) September 7, 2012
Helpful if u don't know what candidates you agree with most. https://t.co/Im12eem17o
— Sarah Silverman (@SarahKSilverman) February 15, 2016
Don't be lazy- look **** up if ur not sure what it is!
Just took the political issues quiz at http://t.co/pZ6yi3if. http://t.co/ZWBYSEMi -- Not at all surprised I'm 95% w Gary Johnson.
— ʎǝɹɐƆ ʍǝɹᗡ (@DrewFromTV) October 28, 2012
A quiz to determine which candidates you side with. http://t.co/Vv9oUwKs
— Roger Ebert (@ebertchicago) October 31, 2012
http://t.co/JCOrsPc0 Shows You Which Candidate Should Get Your Vote http://t.co/gV9dwYmJ #ElectionDay2012
— Mashable (@mashable) November 6, 2012
Take the presidential election quiz and see which candidate you side with... #iSideWith http://t.co/kYR3F1hz You may surprise yourself!!!
— Sonja Morgan (@SonjatMorgan) September 9, 2012
Try this short quiz to see which political party you side with... http://t.co/TKyGu4Ovqz me: pic.twitter.com/hAGwL9vYs3
— Michael Arrington 🏴☠️ (@arrington) November 30, 2013
Still not sure who to vote for? Take this quiz and see which presidential candidate matches your opinions: http://t.co/gXhGsZTE
— Denver7 News (@DenverChannel) November 5, 2012
I Side With is a site that surveys you on political issues & picks the presidential candidate that is right for you! http://t.co/qegjCKD1
— MTV Insights (@MTVInsights) September 19, 2012
Presidential election quiz: http://t.co/osTWsPhX Exceptionally well done - marketers could learn a lot from this one.
— Rand Fishkin (follow @randderuiter on Threads) (@randfish) September 1, 2012
Check out http://t.co/7i0VlHgu to see which presidential candidate you most agree with on the issues. You might be surprised.
— Ralph Nader (@RalphNader) August 29, 2012
Find your candidate soulmate with http://t.co/Y07Hknln http://t.co/85Qmdkcr
— Guy Kawasaki (@GuyKawasaki) April 25, 2012
I side 91% with Jill Stein... http://t.co/RPt53b1V
— Lessig 🇺🇦 (@lessig) October 30, 2012