@ISIDEWITHQuestionsimmigrationStarted 8yrs agoActive 1yr ago

Should immigrants be allowed to hold dual citizenship status?

Should immigrants to Japan be allowed to hold dual citizenship status?

Multiple citizenship, also called dual citizenship is a person's citizenship status, in which a person is concurrently regarded as a citizen of more than one state under the laws of those states. There is no international convention which determines the nationality or citizen status of a person, which is defined exclusively by national laws, which vary and can be inconsistent with each other. Some countries do not permit dual citizenship. Most countries that permit dual citizenship still may not recognize the other citizenship of its nationals within its own territory, for example, in relation to entry into the country, national service, duty to vote, etc.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  Constitutional Democratic

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 2.7k Constitutional Democratic voters.

70%
Yes
30%
No
56%
Yes
28%
No
8%
Yes, unless they have committed a crime
1%
No, and revoke the status for those currently holding dual citizenship
3%
Yes, unless they have committed an act of terrorism
1%
No, and we should not allow any new immigrants into the country at this time
2%
Yes, but they should not be able to claim citizenship status of more than two nations

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.7k Constitutional Democratic voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 2.7k Constitutional Democratic voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Constitutional Democratic voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9JTY5RLanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, but no more than two nations and not from those of uncivilized nations for example in Africa or the middle-east

 @9JNPM56answered…1yr1Y

No, we should never allow more immigrants and those holding dual citizenship should have their status revoked.

 @98ZR4L7from Ibaraki  answered…2yrs2Y

If they are valid

 @97XPMGYfrom Iowa  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only when they are living in our country

 @8QRFGCRfrom Hyogo  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and all citizenship should be abolished

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2wks2W

Jon Stewart Begs Democrats To ‘Please Stop Trotting Out Chuck Schumer!'

Jon Stewart criticized Democrats for repeatedly using Chuck Schumer as their spokesperson against Trump, calling his performances ineffective and monotonous.Stewart mocked Schumer's response to Trump's trade war threats, particularly his simplistic explanation about Mexican imports like Corona beer and avocados.The former Daily Show host expressed frustration at Schumer's basic observation that "guacamole is made of avocados" as a response to complex trade policy issues.Stewart sarcastically highlighted the Democrats' poor strategic choice in selecting Schumer to counter Trump, whom he described as "one of the most savvy presidential media manipulators in history."The comedian ridiculed Schumer's appearance and presentation style, particularly mocking his use of reading glasses positioned low on his nose.Stewart's criticism centered on the Democratic leadership's judgment in repeatedly choosing an "uninteresting" and "monotone" spokesperson.The commentary addressed Trump's threats of tariffs against Canada and Mexico, though focused more on the Democratic response than the policy itself.Stewart used hyperbole to emphasize his point, stating that Schumer's speaking makes him "want to bomb Canada."The piece highlighted the perceived disconnect between Democratic messaging strategy and effective opposition to Trump's policies.Stewart's criticism suggested a broader frustration with Democratic leadership's media strategy and public presentation.

▲  4817 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1wk1W

Gavin Newsom Defends Immigrants With $25 Million

Governor Newsom signed legislation allocating $50 million total to protect California's policies from Trump administration challenges and defend immigrants facing deportation, split evenly between the state's DOJ and legal defense groups.The funding comes as California anticipates renewed conflicts with Trump's administration, following over 100 legal actions against his first term policies on issues including climate, water, and immigration.Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas justified the funding by characterizing the Trump administration as "out-of-control" and threatening to Californians' constitutional rights.The signing occurred just after Newsom's Washington visit to secure federal disaster aid for January's devastating Los Angeles wildfires, which claimed more than two dozen lives.California recently enacted a separate $2.5 billion fire relief package, with expectations of federal reimbursement for disaster response costs.Republican lawmakers criticized the legal defense funding as a political distraction from wildfire recovery efforts, with State Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones calling it a "slush fund."Critics raised concerns about the possibility of funds being used to defend immigrants with serious felony convictions, though Newsom indicated this wasn't the intended purpose.The legislation emerged from a special session Newsom called shortly after Trump's election in November, demonstrating California's proactive stance against anticipated federal challenges.During Trump's first term, California initiated more than 120 lawsuits against his administration, spending approximately $42 million on legal battles.Annual legal expenses fighting federal policies during Trump's first term ranged from $2 million to nearly $13 million per year.

▲  1120 replies