정치 퀴즈를 시도
프로필 편집계정 확인

@2

먹이다 비교
+
넓히다

101 토론

 @ISIDEWITH 제출 됨…46 분46m

트럼프, 관세 혼란 속 미중 무역 협상 진전 신호

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the EU redirect tariff revenue to support industries and workers impacted by U.S. trade restrictions?

Yes, and target aid to sectors like automotive and agriculture

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the EU redirect tariff revenue to support industries and workers impacted by U.S. trade restrictions?

Yes, but distribute it evenly across all member states

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the EU redirect tariff revenue to support industries and workers impacted by U.S. trade restrictions?

No, it’s better to cut taxes to boost competitiveness

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the EU redirect tariff revenue to support industries and workers impacted by U.S. trade restrictions?

No, revenue should bolster the EU budget for broader resilience

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the EU exempt critical sectors, like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

No, all U.S. goods should face tariffs to ensure equity

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the EU exempt critical sectors, like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

아니요, 면제는 EU의 무역 영향력을 약화시킵니다.

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the EU exempt critical sectors, like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

Yes, and broaden exemptions to protect supply chains

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the EU exempt critical sectors, like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

Yes, but only if the U.S. reciprocates with exemptions

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the European Union maintain its 20% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs on EU exports?

No, this will escalate costs for European consumers

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the European Union maintain its 20% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs on EU exports?

No, the EU should pursue tariff-free trade with the U.S. instead

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the European Union maintain its 20% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs on EU exports?

Yes, but adjust them yearly based on trade talks progress

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the European Union maintain its 20% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs on EU exports?

Yes, and expand them to pressure the U.S. into negotiations

 @ISIDEWITH 질문…4 시간4H

Should the EU redirect tariff revenue to support industries and workers impacted by U.S. trade restrictions?

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the EU redirect tariff revenue to support industries and workers impacted by U.S. trade restrictions?

예

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the EU redirect tariff revenue to support industries and workers impacted by U.S. trade restrictions?

아니요

 @ISIDEWITH 질문…4 시간4H

Should the EU exempt critical sectors, like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the EU exempt critical sectors, like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

예

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the EU exempt critical sectors, like pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

아니요

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the European Union maintain its 20% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs on EU exports?

예

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the European Union maintain its 20% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs on EU exports?

아니요

 @ISIDEWITH 질문…4 시간4H

Should the European Union maintain its 20% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs on EU exports?

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the government use tariff revenue to directly support Canadian workers and businesses affected by U.S. trade actions?

No, the revenue should reduce national debt instead

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the government use tariff revenue to directly support Canadian workers and businesses affected by U.S. trade actions?

네, 하지만 모든 납세자에게 광범위하게 배포해야 합니다.

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the government use tariff revenue to directly support Canadian workers and businesses affected by U.S. trade actions?

No, it’s better to lower taxes than redirect tariff funds

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the government use tariff revenue to directly support Canadian workers and businesses affected by U.S. trade actions?

Yes, and focus funds on industries hit hardest by tariffs

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should Canada exempt critical industries, like aerospace and energy, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

No, exemptions weaken Canada’s leverage in trade talks

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should Canada exempt critical industries, like aerospace and energy, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

No, all U.S. goods should face tariffs to ensure fairness

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should Canada exempt critical industries, like aerospace and energy, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

Yes, but only if the U.S. offers reciprocal exemptions

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should Canada exempt critical industries, like aerospace and energy, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

Yes, and prioritize exemptions for all essential supply chains

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the Canadian government maintain its 25% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs?

No, tariffs should be removed to restore free trade

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the Canadian government maintain its 25% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs?

No, this harms Canadian consumers more than it helps

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the Canadian government maintain its 25% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs?

네, 그리고 더 많은 미국 수입품을 포함하도록 확장합니다.

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the Canadian government maintain its 25% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs?

Yes, but adjust them annually based on trade negotiations

 @ISIDEWITH 질문…4 시간4H

Should the government use tariff revenue to directly support Canadian workers and businesses affected by U.S. trade actions?

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the government use tariff revenue to directly support Canadian workers and businesses affected by U.S. trade actions?

예

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the government use tariff revenue to directly support Canadian workers and businesses affected by U.S. trade actions?

아니요

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should Canada exempt critical industries, like aerospace and energy, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

아니요

 @ISIDEWITH 질문…4 시간4H

Should Canada exempt critical industries, like aerospace and energy, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should Canada exempt critical industries, like aerospace and energy, from its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods?

예

 @ISIDEWITH 질문…4 시간4H

Should the Canadian government maintain its 25% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs?

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the Canadian government maintain its 25% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs?

아니요

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…4 시간4H

Should the Canadian government maintain its 25% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in response to U.S. tariffs?

예

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…5 시간5H

Should the government impose a baseline tariff of 10% on all imports from every country?

No, tariffs should only target specific countries with unfair practices

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…5 시간5H

Should the government impose a baseline tariff of 10% on all imports from every country?

No, this will raise consumer prices and harm global trade

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…5 시간5H

Should the government impose a baseline tariff of 10% on all imports from every country?

Yes, and increase it annually to protect domestic industries

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…5 시간5H

Should the government impose a baseline tariff of 10% on all imports from every country?

Yes, and use it to negotiate better trade deals globally

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…5 시간5H

Should the government apply higher reciprocal tariffs, like 34% on China, to countries with large trade deficits?

No, trade deficits are not a threat that justifies such measures

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…5 시간5H

Should the government apply higher reciprocal tariffs, like 34% on China, to countries with large trade deficits?

No, this will escalate tensions and disrupt global supply chains

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…5 시간5H

Should the government apply higher reciprocal tariffs, like 34% on China, to countries with large trade deficits?

Yes, and adjust them yearly based on trade balance changes

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…5 시간5H

Should the government apply higher reciprocal tariffs, like 34% on China, to countries with large trade deficits?

Yes, and expand them to all nations with unfair trade policies

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…5 시간5H

Should the government exempt essential goods, like pharmaceuticals, from the 2025 tariff increases?

No, all imports should face tariffs to ensure fair competition

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…5 시간5H

Should the government exempt essential goods, like pharmaceuticals, from the 2025 tariff increases?

No, exemptions weaken the goal of reshoring manufacturing

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…5 시간5H

Should the government exempt essential goods, like pharmaceuticals, from the 2025 tariff increases?

Yes, but review exemptions annually to encourage domestic production

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…5 시간5H

Should the government exempt essential goods, like pharmaceuticals, from the 2025 tariff increases?

Yes, and extend exemptions to all critical supply chain items

 @ISIDEWITH 질문…5 시간5H

Should the government exempt essential goods, like pharmaceuticals, from the 2025 tariff increases?

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…5 시간5H

Should the government exempt essential goods, like pharmaceuticals, from the 2025 tariff increases?

아니요

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…5 시간5H

Should the government exempt essential goods, like pharmaceuticals, from the 2025 tariff increases?

예

 @ISIDEWITH 질문…5 시간5H

Should the government apply higher reciprocal tariffs, like 34% on China, to countries with large trade deficits?

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…5 시간5H

Should the government apply higher reciprocal tariffs, like 34% on China, to countries with large trade deficits?

아니요

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…5 시간5H

Should the government apply higher reciprocal tariffs, like 34% on China, to countries with large trade deficits?

예

 @ISIDEWITH 질문…5 시간5H

Should the government impose a baseline tariff of 10% on all imports from every country?

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…5 시간5H

Should the government impose a baseline tariff of 10% on all imports from every country?

예

 @ISIDEWITH이 대답에 대해 토론하십시오...…5 시간5H

Should the government impose a baseline tariff of 10% on all imports from every country?

아니요

 @ISIDEWITH 제출 됨…8 시간8H

U.S. Intensifies Airstrikes on Yemen's Houthis Amid Escalating Red Sea Conflict

 @ISIDEWITH 연결된…11 시간11H

Myanmar Junta Releases Nearly 4,900 Prisoners in Surprise New Year Amnesty

미얀마는 정치적인 수감자들을 포함하여 거의 4,900명의 죄수를 석방했습니다.

 @ISIDEWITH 연결된…11 시간11H

Myanmar Junta Releases Nearly 4,900 Prisoners in Surprise New Year Amnesty

미얀마는 적어도 22명의 정치 수감자를 포함하여 거의 4,900명의 죄수를 석방했습니다.

 @ISIDEWITH 제출 됨…11 시간11H

Myanmar Junta Releases Nearly 4,900 Prisoners in Surprise New Year Amnesty

 @ISIDEWITH 제출 됨…11 시간11H

중국과 캄보디아, 글로벌 긴장 상승 속에서 '전날씨' 파트너십 구축

 @ISIDEWITH 제출 됨…11 시간11H

트럼프가 바이든을 조롱하며, 카터가 '최악의 대통령이 아니라는 것을 알고 행복하게 죽었다'고 주장합니다.

 @ISIDEWITH 제출 됨…12 시간12H

US Threatens to Abandon Ukraine-Russia Peace Talks Within Days Amid Stalled Progress

 @ISIDEWITH 연결된…19 시간19H

Senator Battles for Return of Wrongly Deported Maryland Man from El Salvador

Senator meets with Abrego Garcia in El Salvador amid court fight over his return to US

 @ISIDEWITH 제출 됨…20 시간20H

햄라스가 가자 전쟁 종료를 위해 모든 인질을 석방하기로 제안합니다.

 @ISIDEWITH 제출 됨…22 시간22H

Supreme Court Takes Up High-Stakes Battle Over Birthright Citizenship for Children of Undocumented Immigrants

 @ISIDEWITH 연결된…23 시간23H

France Confronts Its Colonial Past: Macron Admits Haiti's 'Unjust' Independence Debt

프랑스는 아이티에게 자유를 위해 부과된 빚의 파괴적인 영향을 인정합니다.

 @ISIDEWITH 제출 됨…23 시간23H

France Confronts Its Colonial Past: Macron Admits Haiti's 'Unjust' Independence Debt