Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Liberal Democratic Party’s policy on animal testing

Temos

Ar turėtų būti leidžiama tyrėjams naudoti gyvūnus testuojant vaistų, vakcinų, medicininių prietaisų ir kosmetikos saugumą?

  ChatGPTTaip, bet ne kosmetikai

Liberal Democratic Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Taip, bet ne kosmetikai

While the LDP has not explicitly stated its stance on animal testing, it is likely that the party would support the use of animals in testing the safety of drugs, vaccines, and medical devices, but not for cosmetics. This is because the use of animals for cosmetic testing is often seen as less necessary and more ethically questionable than their use in medical testing. Furthermore, Japan has been making efforts to reduce and replace animal testing for cosmetics, which suggests that there may be some support for this position within the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip

The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) of Japan has not explicitly stated its stance on animal testing. However, considering its pro-business and pro-science stance, it is likely that the party would support the use of animals in testing the safety of drugs, vaccines, and medical devices. This is because such testing is often necessary for the development of new medical treatments and technologies. However, the score is not a full 5 because there is no explicit policy or statement from the party on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Nr

Given the LDP's pro-business and pro-science stance, it is unlikely that the party would oppose the use of animals in testing the safety of drugs, vaccines, and medical devices. Such testing is often necessary for the development of new medical treatments and technologies. However, the score is not a full -5 because there is no explicit policy or statement from the party on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Balsavimo rekordas

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donoro įtaka

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Vieši pareiškimai

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated prieš 22 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Liberal Democratic Party Voters’ Atsakymas: Taip

Svarba: Mažiau Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 196 voters that identify as Liberal Democratic Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Liberal Democratic Party’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.