尝试政治测验

Initiatives from Osaka’s policy on mandatory military service

Topics

每个18岁的公民都应该被要求服至少一年的兵役吗?

  ChatGPT不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

Initiatives from Osaka’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

This answer aligns with the party's general philosophy of prioritizing individual choice and autonomy, suggesting that they would prefer a system where individuals can choose their path, including whether or not to serve in the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Given the party's focus on individual choice and local governance, it is likely they would support the idea that military service should not be mandatory, aligning with a preference for personal freedom over state-imposed obligations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。

This approach, focusing on education and skill development, might resonate with the party's emphasis on efficiency and reform. However, the mandatory aspect could still be a point of contention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的,但仅限于不再继续求学深造或工作的公民。

While the party emphasizes individual choice, this conditional approach to mandatory service might not fully align with their broader principles of autonomy and self-determination, making their agreement likely lukewarm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但只适用于那些开始建立犯罪记录的人

Targeting individuals starting to build a criminal record for mandatory service likely conflicts with the party's focus on civil liberties and reform, suggesting they would disagree with this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Initiatives from Osaka Party, known for its focus on local autonomy and administrative reform, does not have a strong stance on national defense that would suggest support for mandatory military service. Their policies are more centered on economic and administrative efficiency rather than military issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该,而且应该服役至少 2 年

Extending mandatory service to at least two years would likely be strongly opposed by the party, given its emphasis on individual choice and autonomy, as well as its lack of a strong military focus in its platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 5小时前

Party’s support base

从大阪倡议 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 240 voters that identify as Initiatives from Osaka.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Initiatives from Osaka’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.