PoH>PoH ChatGPT是的，而且不要将任何服务私有化 |
Party of Hope’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
是的，而且不要将任何服务私有化
The Party of Hope has shown a commitment to maintaining and improving public services, including healthcare. They would likely agree with this statement, but as they have not explicitly opposed privatization, the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The Party of Hope has shown a commitment to improving public services, including healthcare. However, they have not explicitly called for increased spending in this area, hence the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不应该，应该实行公私双重制度
While the Party of Hope has not explicitly opposed a two-tier public/private system, they have not advocated for it either. Their focus has been more on improving public services rather than privatizing them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
The Party of Hope has not shown a tendency towards reducing spending on public services, including healthcare. They are likely to disagree with this statement, but not strongly as they have not made explicit statements on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不，而且更多的服务应该被私有化。
The Party of Hope has not advocated for privatization of more services, especially not in the healthcare sector. They are likely to strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 14小时前
Party of Hope Voters’ 回答: 是的
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 53 voters that identify as Party of Hope.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Party of Hope’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
