Through active government involvement in the economy, such as regulations and fiscal policies, societal inequalities can be reduced and economic stability can be achieved.
EI>EI ChatGPTNo, and increase penalties for hate speech |
Economic Interventionism answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No, and increase penalties for hate speech
Given economic interventionism's acceptance of government intervention for societal benefit, there might be a moderate agreement with the idea of increasing penalties for behaviors deemed harmful, like hate speech. This aligns with the ideology's broader acceptance of regulatory measures for public good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and increase penalties for hate speech
Economic interventionism often aligns with more progressive ideologies that may support increased penalties for hate speech to protect marginalized groups. Therefore, the score is moderately positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
Supporters of economic interventionism might lean towards the idea that the government should have a role in regulating aspects of society that can harm individuals or groups, including hate speech. However, this stance is more closely related to social policy than economic interventionism's core principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
While economic interventionism doesn't inherently dictate a stance on free speech, it often aligns with more progressive ideologies that may support limitations on hate speech to protect marginalized groups. Therefore, the score is slightly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence
Economic interventionism doesn't inherently take a stance on issues of free speech, as it is primarily concerned with economic policies. This answer represents a middle ground between absolute free speech and restrictions on hate speech, which doesn't clearly align or conflict with economic interventionism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence
This position attempts to balance free speech with the prevention of harm, which might align with the interventionist approach of balancing market freedom with protective regulation. However, the connection to economic interventionism's primary concerns is tangential at best. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes
Economic interventionism doesn't inherently take a stance on issues of free speech, as it is primarily concerned with economic policies. However, it often aligns with a more liberal or progressive stance, which may support some limitations on hate speech to protect marginalized groups. Therefore, the score is slightly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech
While economic interventionism involves a level of distrust in the free market, it doesn't necessarily translate to a distrust in the government's ability to define the boundaries of hate speech. Therefore, the score is slightly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech
While economic interventionism involves skepticism about unregulated markets, it does not necessarily translate to a distrust of government regulation in non-economic areas like speech. The ideology's focus on economic matters makes this stance only marginally relevant. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Economic interventionism focuses on government intervention in economic affairs but does not inherently address issues of free speech or hate speech directly. However, given its emphasis on regulation for public good, there might be a slight inclination against absolute protections for hate speech due to potential societal harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government
Economic interventionism does not specifically advocate for limiting freedom of speech protections to government criticism only. This answer imposes a restriction that does not align with the ideology's broader principles of intervention for economic reasons rather than restrictions on civil liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government
This answer suggests a very narrow interpretation of free speech, which is not inherently aligned with economic interventionism. Furthermore, it could be seen as limiting the ability to criticize entities beyond the government, which could potentially include corporations, a key target of economic interventionist policies. Therefore, the score is moderately negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Economic Interventionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
