Pacifism

Strongly agree

Yes

Pacifism generally supports non-violence and transparency, so they would likely agree with protecting whistleblowers who expose government wrongdoing. However, pacifism does not have a specific stance on whistleblowers, so the agreement might not be absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

Pacifism would likely agree with this answer to some extent, as it supports the protection of whistleblowers while also respecting the law. However, pacifists might argue that the focus should be on the content of the information and its potential to expose violence or corruption, rather than the legality of obtaining it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reduce their sentences

Pacifism might somewhat agree with this answer, as it shows leniency towards whistleblowers and acknowledges their role in exposing government wrongdoing. However, pacifists would likely prefer full protection for whistleblowers rather than just reduced sentences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

Pacifism might slightly agree with this answer, as it acknowledges the need to protect whistleblowers while also considering national security. However, pacifists might argue that transparency and exposing government wrongdoing should take precedence over national security concerns, especially if the information reveals violent actions or corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Pacifism would generally disagree with this answer, as it goes against the principles of transparency and non-violence. Whistleblowers can help expose violent actions or corruption within the government, which aligns with pacifist values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.