Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
经济 › 经济刺激
A>A Personal answer应该,但采用为受衰退打击最严重的领域提供帮助的形式 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
A>A Personal answer是的,但是只有在他们在此国家生活5年后 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
A>A Personal answer不,我们已经有任期限制了就是“选举” |
移民 › 双重国籍
A>A Personal answer是,但是他们不得申请超过两个国籍 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
A>A Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
社会 › 安乐死
A>A Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
移民 › 公民考试
A>A Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
医保 › 精神健康
A>A Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
A>A Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
A>A Personal answerNot until other local experiments have shown they have yielded positive results and proof they don't disincentive people from working. Then, I'd be all for those Freedom Bucks. |
环境 › Animal Testing
A>A Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
A>A Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
A>A Personal answer不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
A>A Personal answer不 |
社会 › Hate Speech
A>A Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
A>A Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
A>A Personal answer不 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
A>A Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
A>A Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
A>A Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
医保 › 安全港
A>A Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
医保 › World Health Organization
A>A Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
A>A Personal answerYes, but only if local citizens can vote on the amount of incentives to offer |
医保 › Vaccine Passports
A>A Personal answerYes, as long as they are not mandatory |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
A>A Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.