+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1k Neoliberalism voters.

25%
Yes
75%
No
20%
Yes
67%
No
2%
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
8%
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
2%
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
0%
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
0%
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1k Neoliberalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1k Neoliberalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Neoliberalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9JTY5RLanswered…10mos10MO

CERTAINLY! It should be for 5 years of service, it should be seen as an honour to serve in the military as well!

 @94H4S9Vfrom Hyogo  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but they should decrease the training time and provide a better environment and offerings. The current salary for Korean soldiers is too less. As the US did, the government should provide a bunch of benefits since all the young Korean man are spending their time in the country.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Mandatory Military Service” news articles, updated frequently.