Statistics are shown for this demographic
City
Response rates from 3.5k Liberal Conservatism voters.
27% Yes |
73% No |
21% Yes |
66% No |
3% Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development |
7% No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
2% Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment |
|
1% Yes, and it should be at least two years of service |
|
1% Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 3.5k Liberal Conservatism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 3.5k Liberal Conservatism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Liberal Conservatism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9JTY5RL10mos10MO
CERTAINLY! It should be for 5 years of service, it should be seen as an honour to serve in the military as well!
@94H4S9V2yrs2Y
Yes, but they should decrease the training time and provide a better environment and offerings. The current salary for Korean soldiers is too less. As the US did, the government should provide a bunch of benefits since all the young Korean man are spending their time in the country.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Mandatory Military Service” news articles, updated frequently.